“How to get knowledge of the world”and “what is knowledge”are both difficult topics for me to understand. To have a better understanding of Plato’s Theaetetus,I surfed the Internet to search for some materials about Socrates. Socrates was a classical Greek (Athenian) philosopher and was one of the founders of Western philosophy. He used the dialectic method to debate with others,which have a significant impact on the later philosophers. Although he didn’t bring forward his definition of the knowledge, I was inspired by him and understood that it is the soul that view things herself through the organ and forms the conception automatically. Socrates imagined himself as a midwifery helping young thinkers to create noble thought. In fact he did well.From putting forward this question,Socrates made sure that Theaetus was a man with noble though. Also,I searched many other philosophers’ works. In Aristotle's works,he attributed our cognition to our learning from experiences. In this way,our conception plays an important role on obtaining knowledge. Meanwhile, Socrates did not stress the importance of experiences.Maybe it is his limitation in that time.
Critique of Pure Reason
As for Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,he proposed an new idea that objects must conform to our cognition. It is hard for me to figure out what Kant said. In the lecture class,the professor told us the history of the philosophical development and gave us a clear explanation of Kant’s thought. As far as I am concerned,the meaning of “cognition must conform to objects” is that we can not have a knowledge of a object until we perceive it. We use our different method to observe the object and carry out experiment to figure out what it is. By doing this, we can form a conception of a object after our observation of it. On the contrary,Kant put forward the idea that "objects must confirm to our cognition",explaining that we should form a conception first,which is also called A Priori. For human,we can not get knowledge of the world because our knowledge is limited. Let us assume,as if we were the god sitting there with totally object view of the world. Then from that stand of points,we will see human can not have the objective knowledge of the world because our conception of the world is structured by your faculty of knowledge. Different people may have different A priori. The same object in different places will have different meaning.For instance,a can of Coca Cola dropped in jungle will be regarded as an artifact from god,and the primitive will pray towards it. That is because our recognition differs from primitive’s recognition .Even the same object,what you perceived from the object may differ from what I perceived.Every one has different world and your world is different from mine.In fact,Kant investigate the critic of pure reason to see how it is possible to have knowledge of the world. A priori is organized according to categories and form of intuition. These outside “bodies” are constituted by form space,time and twelve categories from our conception.Meanwhile,perception is a way for us to perceive the world. Perception and concetpyion supplyment each other. If we can not perceive objects,our cognition have nothing to be based on. Meanwhile,If we can not form a conception,what we've seen before our eyes become meaningless. That is to say:"perception without conception is blind; conception without perception is empty". All in all,our cognition is formed by forms of intuition and twelve categories.
Here is the table of Categories:
Quantity
|
Quality
|
Relation
|
Modality
|
Unity
|
Reality
|
Subsistence
|
Possibility
|
Plurality
|
Negation
|
Causality
|
Existence
|
Totality
|
Negation
|
Community
|
Necessity
|
(u1ucvszr)
Hej,
ReplyDeleteI like that you looked at some other philosophers after the lecture, but I felt that you could have elaborated a bit more on how they relate to your insights on Plato. I also would have liked if you could have written more about your individual learnings from the lecture and the seminar - what did you understand better? Which new questions did you come up with?
Thank you very much for your advice.It's very nice of you.I'll try to think over on it.In my perspective, in Socrates time, they did not notice much about the influnce on our conception. While in Aristotle's time, there were some complements on it. Thank you.(I deleted my last comment and add some view of mine on it,LOL )
DeleteI like your analysis of both texts, and the fact that you search the background of the philosopher Socrates and Aristotle. There were so many new meanings and ideas that we had to understand in theme 1. I think that you briefly explain most of them! Good job!
ReplyDeleteHello!
ReplyDeleteI felt when reading you text that you really had thought about the different concepts that we have discussed in class and that you understood them thoroughly. I also wrote about the concept of "perception without conception is empty [...] " and I also thought that that was an interesting saying and how we, as humans can't experience life if we're missing one of them ! Overall I think you've done a good job at understanding this weeks main ideas and concepts!
Hej,
ReplyDeleteI am very happy to see you post, well done! For you analysis and reflection of both texts i could see you are really spent a huge time to think about what kant and plato's theories meaning, espically in kant's part after prepering two group's seminar that give me a new understanding for this theme1. I agree all you wrote in this post. Well done again, 加油 :)
Hi, it was a pleasure to read your reflection. I will keep in mind new points. For instance, that the soul helps us to see through eyes. Also, it was an interesting statement how recognition varies in different societies; I mean the example of Coca Cola can. As far as I understood, Kant did not raise the question about perception in different cultures how it differs from primitive’s recognition. In my mind, nowadays, we tend to link perception with external influences such as the level of development, cultural factories. You wrote that a priori is organized in terms of 12 categories. I would not be so sure because if we assume that a priori is verified judgment which does not require any experience, do we still need categories to establish a priori?
ReplyDeleteI find it quite interesting with the difference in language from the post prior to- and post the theme 1. I would say that to the first post, while I do believe you've done a quite good job at answering the questions and understanding the fundamentals of the concepts, it gets kind of tedious to read at times since you basically use words that are in the text. Now that's not bad at all, and I still think you got it right, but what's really good is your post-reflection! You explain everything in simpler terms, and it seems to me that you've understood most of what needed to be understood.
ReplyDeleteI like that you talked a little about the twelve categories of understanding as well!!
Keep it up!
Hi!
ReplyDeleteI think you emphasize both the text, Theaetetus and the Critique of Pure Reason, very well. You make an ambitious review of Socrates, which allows you to make a more comprehensive blog post about the text, Theaetetus. The review of Kant's is also a well-written presentation, highlighting the important key words and presenting Kants table of categories, making it easier to understand. Well done!
/Paul
Hi,
ReplyDeletei am glad to read your reflection and it really enriched my understanding of perceiving the world.I really like that”A priori is organised according to categories and form of intuition.These out side ‘bodies’ are constituted by form space time and twelve categories from our conception.”I agree with you from this point and what’s more is that maybe we will also check out other philosophers’ works to enrich ourselves .
Thanks for your sharing. Keep up.