Friday, October 30, 2015

Final-Commentary

Now that our study of Theory and method course is coming to an end. As it goes "life is a journey to be savored with each step of the way",our course is like a wintage wine to be tasted with each sip of seminar. Although there were plenty conceptions and definitions to be learned every week, although there were numerous complicated and ambiguous ideas to be discussed every seminar, although there are still many questions I haven't figure out until now,our study is meaningful and unforgettable with sparks of wisdom shining inside all the time. Through the six themes, I developed myself both inside (gaining more knowledge) and outside (learning how to do a research in practice).
Initially , when it comes to the question: how to make a good research in media technology field, how can we answer it? Maybe having the basic methodology of perceiving the world and knowing the impact and aim of using media technique is a good idea. Through gaining the basic knowledge of reasearch, we can use different methods to enrich our plan and then make a better reasearch.Consequently, based on these points, this course is aimed at providing a deeper understanding of scientific theories,giving the basic knowledge of methodology,and supplying several useful reasearch methods to us for making a better scientific reasearch.Like the idea in "Critique of Pure Reason[1]",Kant suggest A priori is essential for perceiving the world. Similarly, getting the epistemology[2] is also crucial for the study of research, let alone qualitative method and quantitative method, which can help us improve our quality of research a lot. All these conceptions methods in each theme formed the systemic frame of our course.
Furthermore, new ideas always strike me while studying each theme. As is mentioned above, from Kant's perspective,subjects can be generated into twelve categories and form space and time,which is totally different from our common sense and thus gave me the new idea of gaining knowledge. We should not stay still, or we'll be far behind. Walter Benjamin's[3] story told us that we shall never take everything for granted.Time will change,so did techniques.The conception of portraying horses will change with the technique's development; the Fascism thoughts will rise with the confinement of public's thoughts.Dialecticly,advanced technique can lead to disaster while adversity can also lead to prosperity. Thus we need to have a better understanding of the benifits and limitations of  media research and handle it in a scientific way. What we learned from theme 3 is the conception of research and how to tell from reasearch and theory. As we known from the lecture, theory origins from Greek word which means viewing or seeing.Theory is "a set of propositions"[4] and used to explain phenomena while research is related to practice.During the courses,we divided theory in to different types;we discussed a lot on research;we gain the knowledge of analysis.We armed ourselves by this knowledge not only for grasp the capacity of doing research,but also for holding the tendency of technique to avoide the tragedy rise agian which is in 1939-1945. As for theme 5, what striked me a lot is the importance of having a good idea.How can we let a stone float on the surface of water?The answer is "speed". That is to say,idea can arouse the wealth hiden deeply in the common practice. Haibo Li believe definding a problem is even important than solving it. Good idea finds the shortcut of solving problem, helps us form the prototype[5], accelerates the sepeed of gaining knowledge, which appears take the core of media research. As for theme 4 and theme 6,quantitative method and qualitative method compliment each other and helps us do a better research either in social science or natural sciences. You can not classify them either form the number of participant or form the length of analysis.What is deeply inside is that they are both used for us to gain knowledge with different types of gathering and analyzing information.Finally,reaching a even higher level in the last seminar,Ilias leads us a meaningful discussion of case study, which helps us do a better reseach using comparatively constant steps. To summarise, these themes helped me a lot and gave me a systematic  way of doing media research.
Moreover, making comments helps me a lot. When I looked through the reflection written by other classmates, I always found some interesting points I'd never thought before. For instance, some classmates made an interesting expalantion on qualitative method with an idea that if we anaylze the information from qualtative method, the information which we gathered form the reseach will be narrowed down because when you gather some information form the interview or the expalantion told by participants,you should summarise the information first and other information will be leaked out.That is a quite intersting view I'd never tought before and I agree with what he explained. Whereas, only we summarize the information from the raw datas,can we find a more clear clue of this research. Apparently, we lose many information while analyzing it, but we transfer this raw data into more useful information in the end. Also,reading the comments on my reflection can fix my mistakes and improve my knowledge of each theme
Finally,thanks for the teacher and groupmates who helped me qiute much.During the lecture, I met plenty of questions which I can not solve by myself.While by asking the lecture leader, I rethought these questions and had new comprehension on them. Similarly, in the seminar, we made lots of intersting discussion and shared our view with others. For instance, I could not grasp the idea of case study[6] at first.While in the seminar, one of my groupmates had a excellent understanding on case study. He explained that a case study is a research strategy which focus on our comprehension and is a kind of guidance with clear steps for us to conduct study.This helped me a lot.
All in all, Theory and Method for Media Technology is an excellent course which is useful for me the whole life.
(u1ucvszr)

References

[1]Kant Critique of Pure Reason trans.by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood
[2]Plato Theaetetus trans.by Benjamin Jowett
[3]Walter Benjamin The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction trans.by Harry Zohn(2005)
[4]Prototype  Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia(2015/10/01)
[5]Sutton, R.I.&Staw,B.M.(1995).What Theory is Not.Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371-384.
[6]Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

ALL-COMMENTS

Theme 1
1.The instance of "table" is of great impression because you gave me an very explicit example on how to explain the difference between"objects confirm to cognition"and"congnition confirms to objects". Also,you well expressed the meaning of "pure reason" by quoting what Kant said.
2.You well explained the meaning of"a priori"and "a posteriori".From "a priori",I believe Kant speak highly of the importance of apriorism,which suggest that we should form an cognition at first, and then oberve the objects to obtain knowledge of it.
3.It is good to talk about what diffidulty you met in your group.I believe you'd spent quite much time on thinking about what's the meaning of the Kant's words.It is interesting that we can also turn the "expression" and finally got the similar meaning. While,it would be perfecter if you could also add more about your understanding on this reflectin.
4.Your explaination of your understanding is perfect and explict.In your reflection,you mentioned about what your group talk about on these two question,which makes your essay more naturallly.It is impressive to mention what seminar leader said in the class, such as "raw sense data","pen","God's point of view",etc.
link-comment 4
5.In your essay, you well mentioned the evolution of the philosophy on recognition of the world.It is impressing to talk about the "mechanical world" , "primary qualities "and "secondary qualities",becauseI did not catch this part in the class.
link-comment 5
6.I'm sorry that you could not attend the seminar last week. Definitely, you've done much work on trying to understand the recommended literature. It's pretty usefull to use some illustrations inessay. As you illustrated ,I can easily figure out what stucture Kant used.
link-comment 6
7.You've well quoted the Copernican Revolution and Rohlf's words,making it more clear for me to catch"kant's idea of objectivity". Also,your metaphor on "playground" is quite interesting and unique, but I did not understand it quite well. Maybe you mean that different scientist can hold different view of one subject through the faculty and categories.
link-comment 7
8.It is extremely fascinating to use our major knowledge to expain the relationship between "conception" and "perception"!Maybe we can also use a camera(or a microphone) and computer to explain this. Also,I agree with you on the view of "synthetic and analytic judgements".it is also impressive.
link-comment 8
9.Your reflection is logical and expicit.Also,during the fisrt seminar,we all got the point that if there is nobody in the world, the pencil is not a pencil, because it loses its value and becomes meaningless. It was also interesting. We also discussed a lot on baby's cognition.I still don't understand until now.Maybe analytic judgement is kin of a priori,and we use the forms of intuition and categories to get the apriori to get knowledge of the world,enven though we can not understand the real world.
link-comment 9
10.You did quite well in that you could share so many points to us.I really love the example of Albert Einstein.Indeed I was in the other group that time.We all diacussed much about baby.What is interesting is that language can narrow down the baby's horizon,because when he was born,he is totally open to the world.Whereas,it is also his first step to open to the world.(from the seminar leader) quite impressive.
link-comment 10
11.I love your explicit point that "A priori: judgement could be verified before experience". Also, It's great that you found what we missed to discuss in the class. What you talked about on Socrates gave me inspiration. For example,"knowledge is already in our head, we just need to give a birth for knowledge". It's a good point.
link-comment 11

Theme 2
1.I enjoyed your essay a lot by reading the two vivid instances.I like your idea on leaves because it is interesting to reveal that every leaves has its own feature,and they only have the name"leaf" in common.Also,I like your example on the running of horses. Through your essay,I can have a better understanding on our cognition changes due to the evolvement of technique.
link-comment 1
2.I like your essay very much because it contains many of your own ideas,I also have difficulty to understand the"Nominalism"and "Englitenment".Of course you did well to explain the "Nominalism"by explaining that veryone in KTH is unique.Impressive and Interesting.I agree with you that myth can make us continue our normal life.It like a controller sometimes.
link-comment 2 
3.I enjoyed your essay and very appreciate that you can combine the explanation of "Nominalism" with history. Through your tatement of history of Italian fascism,I knew the disadvantage of taking verything for granted without thingking.Platonic realism is a very abstract concept for me and difficult to understand. You explained well on it and I can understand what we perceive nowadays is the reflection of the object in thei deal world.
Keep it up.
link-comment 3
4.Good explanationof the plato's allegory of the cave.You explained very well and I think you did really a lot of work onit. It is also impressive that you said"Adorno and Horkheimer see life in this society as a lottery ticket, you can be good, educate yourself, be hard working but that doesn’t guarantee success and easy life if you don’t have any luck." This gives me a better understanding on the thoghts of Adorno and Horkheimer .
link-comment 4
5.I really love that you could tell the discussion in your group.Obviously you took active part in you group discussion.Using the pink items to describe the universals,I can understand better the meaning of the 'Nominalism'. I think nominalist emphasize the uniqueness of different objests and the universal have less meaning for them. 
It is really a good job. Keep it up.
link-comment 5
6.Thank you for clarifying the time of the two article,which is that "Benjamin writing in Germany before the second world war and Adorno Horkheimer writing in the US during the war."I also misunderstood the attitude of Benjamin and Adorno Horkheimer. Benjamin write his article before the war and died before he wen to American. Maybe he did not know the current situation of the tecnique impact on the public in that times in the U.S. So he still had the hope that technique changes could evoke public.
link-comment 6
7.Absolutely,you wrote a excelent essay with so many explanation on your own thought.I like that you pointed out that plato meant us to go out of the cave to see the real world. You took a really good example on the movie.You said that by zooming, cutting and adding music,we could have a different feeling on the same movie.Also,what I understand is that you can also perceive something new by watch the movie if your ordinary life.Photograph made us reperceive our world.It was excellent.
Keep it up!
link-comment 7
8.Hi,I enjoyed your essay and obviously you did lots of work on it.It is good that you could combine your explanation with history context on your own view. I like what you said"reproduce a mirror of what already exists",Facism used the media to take control of our mind,noble is born to be noble;poverty is born to be poverty. Also,you did it well on explaining the divergence of Adorno and Benjamin.
Keep it up.
link-comment 8
9.I was confused for a long time on the relationship between nominalism and Fascism.Thank you for giving me some views on Fascism inherits tendencies of nominalism.Also,you have a good understanding on the mass media by using “young beautiful secretary” and “old rich boss” these two films. And I also think that maybe the aura of arts refer to its authenticity with its existence in the history.
Good work,keep it up.
link-comment 9
10.I enjoyed your essay a lot and admire that you could adjust your previous work with so explicit explanation.It is a good and effective idea to reverse what we thought before.I like your explanation on the different perspective of Benjamin and Adorno because I misunderstood their attitudes before the seminar.I also like " destroying aura leads to revolutionary possibilities".Although reproduction can diminish the aura of art,at the same time it will increase the exhibition arts,which could lead 
to reconsideration of the world.
Good job,keep it up!
link-comment 10

Theme 3
1.It's a pleasure for me to read your relfection again .You did really well on expaining the concept "theory" with articulated manner.I really like your examples on Newton’s laws of motion,from which I knew theaory is not equal to truth. It can be a "theory" in some limited fields and can also be replaced by new theory.Maybe it's a kind of progess to some extent. Also, The example of quantum physics is very interesting because I've never thoght one theory could be based on other theories.
link-comment 1
2.I really enjoyed your fascinating refection a lot,by its logical structure and well-developed insightful analysis. It's amazing that you could use the instance " pen drops on the ground " to analyze the relationship between "theory" and "knowledge",from which I know theory does not equal to knowledge and it can be incorrect sometimes. Also,I really love your final paragraph,and it is interesting to take God for an instance. Maybe one theory is not necessary to be truth and has its limitation which can be modified by other theory to some extent.Thanks for your impressive essay.Keep it up.
link-comment 2
3.Your eassay helped me have a better comprehension on "theory" and it is well-organized by stating what you've learned according to the time order, which is from Monday's lecture to the seminar. You also made it clear by quoting the meaning of Greek word "theory". From this, I understood the early meaning of theoty,which means seeing and perceiving. It is goodto expain with your own thoughts, like"Paradigm as I perceive it is a way of thinking".
link-comment 3
4.With so much of your own idea and thought,your essay is of good quality.I really enjoyed reading it.You had a good explanation on theory,such as"In generally, theory provide an explanatory framework for an observation".What interested me most is the discussion on "human".You succesufully grasped the aim of this discussion,which is to discuss the relationship between the three concepts theory, human and research. Keep it up.
link-comment 4
5.Your essay is very interesting. I pretty like your instances on "attacked by sharks"and "magnesium carbonate".I could clearly get your point that theory is unnecessary to be true becuse the example of "sharks" is vivid. What I didn't notice before is your point that questioning earlier belief.Obviously it is very important to promote science progress by questioning earlier theory.Like the scientists in Uppsala University,they made angreat contribution to Chemistry not only by creating a new substance but also promting the progress of theory.
link-comment 5
6.It is really good that you expained the concept of theory in a very clear and precise way.As for the discussion of "what is man",you made a detailed list of our view,from which I couldhave a better understanding from multiple perspective.I like the view that man is combination of the human bodies and consciousness.It defined "men"both in physical perspective and spiritual perspective.
link-comment 6
7.I enjoyed your reflection.Definitely you did well in thes reflection. I like your insightful idea that theory and research are inseparable.Although theory is about perceiving and research is about doing,but you can not separate them when doing research in practice. I agree your idea on this.Also, I read the intersting thing is that even though Newton’s laws of motion is proved incorrect in light-speed objects,it can still be used as a theory in may fields.
I like your work.Keep it up.
link-comment 7
8.You really have a good understanding on the conception of theory and I enjoyed your relfection a lot.I extremely like your example about the changing of our thought in the universe.It is quite good example that if one basic theory is proved to be incorrect,it will lead to a series of modification on other theories,just like we chenged our idea from Geocentric theory to Heliocentric theory.Keep it up.
link-comment 8
9.Your reflection is good and interestingand I like it very much.Especially when you expain the idea of "theory of flow" you used the "arrow"to connect each step of the "theory of flow".It can make your explanation easier and clearer by using arrow.Also,I like your sentence "theory is framework or structured knowledge based on that famework rules that explain how and why processes or phenomena work". This summary of the expanation of the theory is really good and logical. Keep it up.
link-comment 9
10.It is really a useful message that hu pothesis is ideas that can be tested. It helps me have more comprehension on theory.Definitely it is interesting to discuss the conception of theory and research.From this discussion I not only knew the meaning and aim of theory but also learned the origin meaning of the word theory from Greek word.It also reminded me about what we learned from Kant because this question is related to the form of knowledge and our perception. I enjoyed your reflection a lot. Keep it up. 
link-comment 10

Theme 4
1.Thank you for writing so excellent reflection for me to read. I love your explanation of how to design a questionnaire,It fully contains your own idea.It remainded me that You we should avoid giving a “leading” question or any suggestibility that cause the participants followed our mind.I totally agree that "It is also very important to test the questionnaire you designed before it could be considered “valid”".I came up a problem due to my questionnaire's deficiency.
Keep up!
link-comment 1
2.Thanks for your fascinating reflection,I am glad that you found this theme different and easier than the previous themes and you really did a good reflection.As for me, I have never have the knowledge of "quantitative method "and "qualitative method "before.So,this seminar is still difficult for me and I could not tell from the quantitative method and qualitative method correctly.I love that "Every questionnaire has to be tested and validate".I met difficulty once upon a time due to my questionnaire's deficiency.
Keep up!
link-comment 2
3.Hi,I really enjoy your explicit reflection a lot!.It is friendly and clear. I pretty like that you could shared what you met in the seminar group. It is intersting that you made the same pre-post paper with your groupmate.Also,It is of great importance to rethink what we had done in pre-homework. It could improve our recognition of the paper and help us obtain some new ideas from old homework.You did a really great job!.As for the quantitative method , you prosed the idea that quantitative method is mainstream of sicence research.I agree with you .
Keep up!
link-comment 3
4.Thanks for your interesting and impressive reflection! You made a good job by explaining what the quantitative is and what the different is between quantitative method and qualitative method.I pretty like your sentences”defined quantitative methods as methods that gather numerical data which later can be used and presented as statistical analyses ”.You made a really good explanation for me.And I agree with you that it is easier for some questions to use qualitative method
link-comment 4
5.Hi,Thanks for bring so impressive reflection.In your essay,you said that "I think the process is quiet hard. Because of the lack of past experiences of quantitative methods in my own projects.",and so do I. I also think quantitative method and qualitative method both are difficult for me. But you made an excellent explanation between them. I really like your words"the quantitative methods could enhance the authenticity and systematicity and reveal the problems in the practices".You really stated the advantages of quantitative method in a explicit way.
Keep up.
link-comment 5
6.Hi,Thanks for bring me so wonderful reflection.I like it very much because it is fully filled your own though.I’m glad to see that this seminar was easy for you,though it was still diffidult for me. Through your esssay, I learnt a lot,like”interview was a qualitative method of research mostly used in the humanities”,etc.I had been not sure about this utill saw this essay.I think that it is good idea to post what we discussed during the seminar and it is also a good idea to share what we write before.
Keep up.
link-comment 6
7.I have to say that I really really love your reflection which is fully filled the aura of wisdom!
I also learnt a lot from your reflection such as '' 'should interview some participants, to see if they’ve understood'. You taught me the meaning of "piloting".I also never thought that "Doing an internet survey is hard in many ways" before. You indeed gave me many inspirations.
Keep up!
link-comment 7
8.Hi,Thanks for your reflection! Indeed I am the person who do not have prior knowledge of quantitative research and of course I think I learnt much from both lecture and seminar.I am glad to see that you made an good explanation on "Drumming in Immersive Virtual Reality",and I think it fascinating too! On the contrary,I think the experiment with the rubber hand is as facinating as the drumming experiment for me. It is beyond my imagination that we can regard out side objects as one part of our body. It seems like that we have already have a extension of our boudy.
I like your reflection, Keep up.
link-comment 8
9.Hi,I really love your reflection! It is fully filled your spark of wisdom.It is intersting that somebody would think quantitative method is originated in numbers and you indeed have a much better understanding of these two methods. Absolutelly,I can see that you really did a lot of work on this seminar.I especially love your instance in the last paragraph from which I can clearly see that quantitative method supplements qualitative method in many field.
I really like your reflection.Keep up!
link-comment 9
10.Hi,Your reflection is extremely excellent and I enjoy reading it a lot. I love the well-structured style of your reflection and from reading it, I can learn a lot.I love your wisdom instance in the third paragraph.It is insithtful to propose that "Categorizing data will almost certainly mean throwing some data away".When we analyze the statistic result,we have to find the relationship of this statistic.In order to find the clue,we have to narrow down the imformation,which is definitely a hidden problem.I also agree with you that quantitative method and qualitative method complement each other,which is also important view.
Keep up!
link-comment 10
11.Hi,I enjoyed reading your reflection a lot.It is interesting that we could use a totally different way to conduct our experiment,just like what Ilias's friends did.If you spent long time with the homeless people,you will learn more information than just doing a questionnaire. Also,thanks for teaching me "data driven analysis".From your essay I knew that what we got from the plan may be out of our imagination.I agree with you that we should choose different methods in different fields.
Keep it up!
link-comment 11

Theme 5
1.Hi,It seems that you did a good job by assembling Haibo Li's idea into five steps. Each step is clear and with good explanation. I agree that this week the lecture is difficult for us to grap. Anyway, you shows that you made an great effort on this topic.I think the hardest step for us is making a prototype because we should use many acedemic knowledge on making it.While Haibo Li thought coming up with a idea is of great importance. And I also think many researches we will do can not be transfered into economic value immediately.
link-comment  1
2.I like to read your reflection because I can learn many new idea from your reflection. Besides the precise summary of what Haibo Li taught in lecture 1,you did a excellent analyzing on lecture 2.As for prototypes,I agree that prototype is used for gaining knowledge,it doesn't need to be a solution.What I learned most from your reflection is the explanation of "Empirical data".Well done
link-comment  2
3.Yeah,Haibo's lecture is vivid and practical while the Anders' lecture contains more information and it is hard to understand. I would like to say I did not understand most of the content in lecture 2.What I know is a bout the use and aim of prototype.While as for the emperical data,I knew less about it.From your perspective, the empirical knowledge is artificial and produced by researcher.
Thanks for your reflection.
link-comment  3
4.Thank you for your good reflection and you made a good reflection on lecture 1.What interested me most during lecture 1 is the "tunnel vision".From that example I knew that we could not take everything for granted and find out the new idea behind our normal life.What he said about idea is that " defining a problem can occupied 90 percent of you time and solving a problem will just spent 10 percent time."But I think solving problem is still important.There are also many researches without shortcut. 
Thanks for your reflection.
link-comment  4
5.I also think it will bring some disadvantages if we do not have a seminar during the week. Haibo Li said " 90% effort into finding and defining the problem and the last 10% on coming up with a solution." I think idea is of great importance because it can help us save the time ,money and effort. Thanks for mention "difference between two types of prototyping; industrial research prototyping and design research prototyping."In fact I missed this point during the lecture.
link-comment  5
6.To evaluate if the concept would be usable is one of the basic use of the prototype.I also agree with you that design a research can lead to knowledge.Thanks for giving me the idea that" If these is no analysis of e.g. interviews there is no research to speak of, only a presentation of data".What is important is to get the conclusion from the what we observed.I also think defining a problem is very important.In fact ,if you define a problem, defining problem is also a part of solving problem.Thanks for sharing
link-comment  6
7.HI,I like what you said:”To do this it is important to avoid tunnel vision and see the problem from a bigger perspective”.If we don not have a deep thought about the problem,our horizon will be narrowed down,and can not solve the problem efficiently.Just like the tunnel vision,if we drive so fast,we can not own the wide perspective which can see the coming obstacle.
Also I think it a pity that you could not attend the second lecture because the second lecture also contained many useful information.
Thanks for your sharing
link-comment  7
8.Thanks for sharing your reflection on the first lecture last week. Before the first lecture,I think the most important thing is how to solving the idea .But in the first lecture,I know that may be it would not be true because only when you rethink the problem a lot and did a good define, can you solve the problem more successfully.But I still do not get the idea of "a great idea is not necessarily a technological innovative idea".Maybe he means it is still worthy to come up a kind of platform for technique.
link-comment  8
9.Hi,You did have a good understanding of the theme 5.Summarizing into five steps, you really made a good summary of what Haibo Li purposed. I really like professor Li's instance of the head tracking research. But I'm nor sure whether the idea is so important as it will take 90 percentage. I also think we could understand better if there had been a seminar for us to discuss. I can not grasp the meaning of empirical data,but maybe I will check on the Internet later.
Thanks for your sharing.
link-comment  9
10.Hi'I also think Haibo gave a new point of view on the lecture for us and he also give me an idea of defining a problem.Thanks for giving me the idea that "a proof of concept is some kind of early prototype", which I didn't understand during the lecture.As for the elevator pitch, it is definitely a way to communicate but it can not be the only way. Maybe we could also explaining the prototype and how it's used.
Thanks for your reflection.
link-comment  10

Theme 6
1.I really agree with you about what is quantitative method and what is qualitative method. If the questionnaire is made up of questions whose answer is already given and made into different level ,then the questionnaire is used the quantitative method. Similarly, if the questionnaire contains many question requiring your own idea and explanation,it must be the qualitative method. Whereas, there are also some questionnaires used both of these two methods.
Thanks for sharing.
link-comment  1
2.Hi,Thanks for your sharing and I agree with you that "A case study looks at something specific"and"It can also be used before conducting a study".While I think it can also to confirm a theory because a case study is more like a guidance with clear steps for us to conduct study. I like your instance that " Of course one could conduct a fruitful study just based on this person. "
thank you
link-comment  2
3.HI,To be true, I really like what you write,"The number of the participants does not define the type of the method. The type of the data that we gather defines the method".It's interesting in your seminar that you were talking about whether the number can determine the types of method. You really made a good reflection,
I also think it is not necessary for a research to contain all the parts of the table, 
because I think the case study is a strategy for you to conduct.It is just used to help you.
thank you.
link-comment  3
4.Hi,
Thanks for your reflection! I agree with you that a case study is a research strategy which focus on comprehension and can give us directions on conducting the research.Whereas,to my understanding, if a questionnaire contains answers of which can be divided into different levels without asking question, it could be quantitative method.
All in all, I love your examples of seminar and your point of view.
link-comment  4
5.Hi,I like the good point that "that the researchers often select some data that are representative for the total resul".I think if we use the qualitative method, we should gather lots of information from the conversation or interview. It is definitely narrowed down when we absorb the infomation from the whole material. But it will help us have a more clear understanding on this study.
Thank you!
link-comment  5
6.Hi,I quite like your reflection that you said "qualitative or quantitative is not depend on the numbers of participants in that research, but decide by the type of data your collected".It is true that you can take information form one participant by using either qualitative method or qualitative method.As for the case study, I think it is a guidance for us to take a research.
Thank you for your reflection
link-comment  6
7.Hi,You said "case study can be considered as more of a research category rather than a method" and I can't agree more ! Of course case study is a guidance that helps you make a good plan for your research. It helps us know how to think up of different idea,It helps us filt different idea and it helps us make scientific plan.All in all ,I can not agree you more. Also, I like your pont that pointing to something new is vey important and significant.
Thank you
link-comment  7
8.Hi,Your reflection is excellent and unique. Firstly, I agree with you that " In qualitative research, the data isn't quantified and summarised in clear tables," I like your explanation that take the qualitative method as one way to tell the story.But I really don't know the meaning of " It examines something in a single setting "May be ,as you said examing is a good way to generate lots of knowledge.
thank you.
link-comment  8
9.Hi,Your reflection is very interesting because I’ve never thought the relationship between hypothesis and case study.Thank you for making me know that incase study, there is no hyphothesis. Your explanation between these two is unique. You must spent lots of time on thinking the relationship between case study and hyphothesis. I also think that in fact ,these two things has different scale.
As for case study, it is more like a guidance or strategy while hypothesis is more like an explanation to explain what is already happened.
Thank you
link-comment  9
10.Hi,I also had no knowledge of case study before. I think finding paper is the most difficult thing because you didn't know whether the paper contains these method. You should read these papers first and then you may find these paper more often used quantitative method ,not the qualitative method.So you have to find a new paper.
I appreciate that I was so lucky to attend the final seminar with a great group. becuse I learned much knowledge from my groupmates.They give me a new understanding on quantitative method and qualitative method.and also they give me a good explanation on what the case study is and what the case study used for.
I also like your reflection very much.Keep it up!
link-comment  10

(u1ucvszr)

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Theme 5-comments

1.http://blog4course99.blogspot.se/2015/10/reflection-on-theme5.html?showComment=1445108276256
2.http://literaturestuffm.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-5-reflections-after-lectures.html?showComment=1445110985292#c5024289777130263242
3.http://alexisdm2572.blogspot.se/2015/10/for-this-weeks-theme-i-have.html?showComment=1445112254249#c3663734758890465308
4.http://cscmediatechnologyassignment.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-5-reflection.html?showComment=1445114209182#c1209089690914711510
5.http://lard-have-mercy.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-theme-5-design-research.html?showComment=1445177954202#c7636615581668831624
6.http://gamlagreker.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-5-reflection.html?showComment=1445178809407
7.https://tmmkappa.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/theme-5-post-reflection-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26
8.http://dm2572byen.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-5-design-research_10.html?showComment=1445199981039
9.http://cloudsong223.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-5after-design-research.html?showComment=1445202097456
10.http://thetheoryandmethodofeverything.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-5-wednesday-reflection.html?showComment=1445203025919

(u1ucvszr)

Theme 6-reflection : Qualitative and case study research

This week, our seminar is based on the topic "Qualititative and case study research". Although we've learned much of the qualitivative method in the last seminar, I am still confused about it. It's hard for me to tell from the quantitative method and qualitative method in one paper. To had a better comprehension of the qualitative method and the case stusy, I read the " Building Theories from Case Study Research" and found out two papers to study on. 
From discussing the papers in our group, I have new knowledge about the qualitative method and case study research. In the group, we discussed that If we do a questionnire which divide the answer in to different levels and without asking question , it would be the quantitative method and we can make ANOVA on it. Meanwile, if we make a interview, it would be the qualitative method because we have to explain our research to the participants , chat with them, analyze the feedback and review perticipants' explanation. From this empirical data, we can gain our knowldege beyond statistics. Similarly, if the questionnaire contains some questions that need participants' explanation, it would be the mixture of qualitative method and quantitative method.
As for case study, it is a totally new concept for me. Thanks for my excellent groupmates, they made me get it clear a bout what the case study is. To sum up,  a case study is a a research strategy which focus on our comprehension and helps us make better steps on conducting the research from coming up with an idea to finnally evaluating it.  Case study is a procedure strategy containing different methods  that helps do the ressearch more efficiently and scientifically. What's the difference between qualitative method and case study? A case study is more like a series of procedures. First, we should come up with some ideas on a specific issue and then choose the best idea to consuct it and after that, collect the information and data etc. Whereas qualitative mehod is just a kind of method. So case study can contains qualitative method or quantitative method or both of them.
What is interesting in the seminar is that since the case study is a strategy, how can we write all the information we met into our paper ? Maybe we don't need to. Since the paper is limited in length, we can not put all the procces of case study into a paper. Instead, we should narrow it down and make what is useful for our gaining knowledge into our paper.
All in all , this seminar helped me a lot.

Monday, October 12, 2015

Theme 4-comments

1.http://cscmediatechnologyassignment.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection.html#comment-form
2.http://literaturestuffm.blogspot.se/2015/10/normal-0-false-false-false-el-x-none-x.html?showComment=1444679375986#c7459069410954878113
3.http://dm2572fan.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-theme-4.html?showComment=1444683511001
4.https://tmmkappa.wordpress.com/2015/10/05/theme-5-post-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-21
5.http://happyblogger7.blogspot.se/2015/09/theme-4-reflection.html?showComment=1444682835930#c5206364859769698273
6.https://agrik.wordpress.com/2015/10/05/qualitatively-quantitative/#comment-39
7.http://stinazwahlen.blogspot.se/2015/10/post-seminar-theme-4.html?showComment=1444685344311#c290871145480977945
8.http://gamlagreker.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-reflection.html?showComment=1444685966971
9.http://cloudsong223.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4after-quantitative-research.html?showComment=1444686808144
10.http://rickardsdm2572.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-4-post-seminar-reflections.html?showComment=1444689058266
11.http://ixxzw.blogspot.se/2015/10/theme-3-after.html?showComment=1444689764442#c7751078250630153017
(u1ucvszr)

Theme 5-reflection:Design research

Last week, we took two lectures which both had the topic "Design research". In order to have a bettter understanding of this topic, we read " Turn Your Mobile Into the Ball: Rendering Live Football Game Using Vibration[1]" and "Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space[2] "before the class.
On the lecture 1, we watched an interesting and impressive slides made by Haibo Li. One of aims of lecture 1 is that how can we design the research (including prototypes technologies, etc.) sufficiently and scientifically. As we know, if we want to design a research,we need to come up a topic which we do research for. That is why Haibo Li stressed the importance  of conforming a good idea at the begining of the lecture. He showed on part of the movie "Johnny English" to us. In the movie, following a young thief tightly, the old spy used his wisdom to get across many obstacles easily, which made the young thief embarassed and exhausted. What I can learn from the movie is  that using different method to solve the same problem will bring out different consequence. That is why idea is so important. Just like the example of "realizing head motion tracking", if we change the camera from computer to our head (making a head-wear camera), things will be greatly different. By change the position of the camera, we can reach the same accuracy level using less data and less time.  It remains me a interesting instance which I read from newspaper. Question: How can we let a stone float on the surface of water? Answer: SpeedIt is like the "Ducks and drakes" game. If we skip the stone on the lake, the stone will not sink into the water. This lecture give me inspiration that maybe I should not take everything for granted, some great idea is hidden under the common sense.
As for the lecture 2, the lecture leader brought many informatin to us which I could not make clear immediately. At first, the lecture leader brought the idea that what the prototype is used for. A prorotype can help us convey our idea, test our idea and fix our idea. It can take us into concept revaluation and what's more is that a prototype is aimed at helping us gain knowledgeWe can use a design to shape a prototype and it does not hve to be a solution as long as we can gain knowledge. I also heard the point of Anders is that doing interview is worse. Maybe when we doing an interview ,we are collecting emperical data ,not analyzing it. When doing interview ,we may also lose many useful information because we 'll narrow down what we heard into record. Only when we anlyzing the data, can we obtain knowledge(I'm not quite clear about this part).The lecture leader also diacussed a lot on the relationship between design practic, design studies and design explanation. But I am still confused on this part. Maybe we could make a further discussion if we have time.
All in all, I think the lectures in last week are useful for us to design a research.
(u1ucvszr)

References
[1]Réhman, S., Sun, J., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2008). Turn Your Mobile Into the Ball: Rendering Live Football Game Using Vibration. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 10(6), 1022-1033
[2]Fernaeus & Tholander Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space  Designing for Tangible Interactions 2006 447-456

Friday, October 9, 2015

Theme 6-pre: Qualitative and case study research

Inferences About Avatars: Sexism, Appropriateness, Anthropomorphism, and the Objectification of Female Virtual Representations[1]
This paper is published by Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication which has a impact factor as high as 3.117. In this paper, in order to find out how virtual representation influence perceptions of message, researchers conducted an investagation on finding out how individuals interpret online images and message online. To conduct this investigation, they made eight virtual representations of women and divided this representation into four conditions and then they recruited 397 participant. Each participant would watch one of four presentations. After that,everyone should also did a questionnaire containing eight different question. 
1.Which qualitative method or methods are used in the paper? Which are the benefitsand limitations of using these methods?
Based on the qualitative method, they proposed many hypothesises like "human brains can not tell the differences between offline people and mediated depictions of social entities" and "When perceiving other humans, people must consider intentionality and emotion as well as possible abilities and personality". After proposing these hypothesises,the researchers had a basic "theory" of how to conduct this reseach. Using qualitative method,we could have a pre-conprehension of the objectification of representations of women. Also, By quoting others' theory and proposing hypothesises,authors can also make the article clear and make us know what we will do next. In this way, we'll have a better understanding on the infuence of individual traits like "sexism on the processing of information" and "Anthropomorphism on the processing of information". Whereas, if we just using the qualititave method to analysis some results of researching, it can not be convincing enough in any fields. This time, we need quantitative method to have a better analysis for us. In this way, it would be more convincing. 
2.What did you learn about qualitative methods from reading the paper?
As for qualitative method, It is useful to propose some hypothesises before the research, which will make the step more clear. We can quote other's theory and we can also propose some new hypothesises based on our empirical experiences. Moreover, we can use the qualitative method to do some interview and compare the consequences from the interview. 
3.Which are the main methodological problems of the study? How could the use of the qualitative method or methods havce been improved?
One of the main methodological problems of this paper is that the author quote too many others' theory in the chapter of "Predicting Attributions of Online Sources". There is little theory made by themselves. They may add some their own points in it. Another problem of  this paper is that what information they got from participant only came from questionnaire. There would be much limitation if we did questionnaire only. Instead,they should conduct interview after the questionnaires were finished. From the interview, we could learn more from the participant, which is also good for analyzing the statistic of the questionnaires.
The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology
1.Briefly explain to a first year university student what a case study is.
The case study is "a research strategy which focuses on understanding the dynamics present within single settings.[2]" It combines many different theory-building process. That is to say, case study contains many different cases(single or multiple), large quantity of analysis, datacollection, reseach method (interviews, questionnaires, oberservations), etc. It is striking that the term qualitative and case study have many things in common,and they can convert each other sometimes, but case study is not equal to qualitative method. Case study can contain quantitative method only and both quantitative method and qualitative method. What is intersting is that if you use the case study method to build a theory, you'll find it is frequently to overlap data analysis with datacollection. All in all,case study is a good research strategy which coontains the proceess: Getting Started,Selecting Cases,Crafting Instruments and Protocols, Entering the Field, etc. 
2.Use the "Process of Building Theory from Case Study Research" (Eisenhardt, summarized in Table 1) to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your selected paper.
I read the paper "The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology[3]". In this paper, researchers would like to find out the impact when iPhone users are seperated from their phone. Compared with the process of case study, this paper had a good beginning by proposing out the psychosocial Role of the Smart Phone,we believe that phones is becoming the extension of ourself. If we can not answer the phone in time we'll be nervous.Then,this paper sucessfully chosed a case which recruiting iPhone users to do the experiment. As for conducting the experiment, the researchers used the quantitative method to make these participant do questionnaires on which participants expressed their feeling into countable statistics. It is good that the researchers also overlaped data collection and analysis. But on the step of "Enfolding Literature".The author of this paper did not made comparision with conflicting literature. It is kind of deficiency.
(u1ucvszr)


References
[1]Kristine L. Nowak,Jesse Fox,Yerina S. Ranjit Inferences About Avatars: Sexism, Appropriateness, Anthropomorphism, and the Objectification of Female Virtual RepresentationsJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication (8,6,2015),554–569.
[2]Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
[3]Russell B. Clayton,Glenn Leshner,Anthony Almond The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology (8.1.2015) 119–135